We Were Never Friends: The Nanjing Massacre and The Media Construction of The Sino-Japanese Diplomatic Stalemate
Abstract
This study aims to analyze how the BBC frames Sino-Japanese relations, focusing on the role of historical memory in the construction of bilateral tensions. This study is based on a constructivist perspective and uses Entman's framing model through qualitative framing analysis of BBC reporting. The analysis focuses on four elements of Entman's framing: problem definition, diagnose causes, make moral judgment, and treatment recommendations. The findings show that the BBC consistently frames history as the main source of tension, representing China as an actor that actively articulates historical memory, while Japan is portrayed as an actor bound by its past and cautious in its responses. This study concludes that media framing plays a role in shaping asymmetrical agency narratives, while also showing how the media contributes to the formation of political meaning and national identity in international relations.
Downloads
References
Aminah, S. (2019). Competing narratives of victimhood and aggression: Japanese memory of wartime in sakae T time in Sakae Tsuboi’s Nijushi No Hit s Nijushi No Hitomi. Journal of Strategic and Global Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.7454/jsgs.v2i1.1013
Anderson, K. F., & Brakstad, I.V. (2016). The impossibility to protect? Media narratives and the responsibility to protect, Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal: 9(3), 96-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.9.3.1331
Beland, D. (2005). Ideas and social policy: An institutionalist perspective. Social Policy and Administration, 39(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00421.x
Capoccia, G., & Kelemen, R. D. (2007). The study of critical junctures: Theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World Politics, 59(3), 341–369. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100020852
Carrai, M. A. (2021). Chinese political nostalgia and Xi Jinping’s dream of great rejuvenation. International Journal of Asian Studies, 18(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479591420000406
Chen X. (2008). Reporting on Sino-Japan in the New York Times: A critical discourse analysis. Intercultural Communication Studies. XVII(1), 139-156.
Deacon, C. (2024). Mnemonic encounters: The construction and persistence of international “History Wars” and the Case of Japan-South Korea Relations. International Studies Quarterly, 68(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqae114
Dencik, L. (2013). What global citizens and whose global moral order? Defining the global at BBC World News. Global Media and Communication, 9(2), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766513479716
Deseran, D. F. H. and F. A. (1981). Trust and symbolic exchange. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3033857
Dian, M. (2015). Interpreting Japan’s contested memory: Conservative and progressive traditions. International Relations, 29(3), 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117815600932
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4). 51-58. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Ering, M. B., Purnama, C., & Sari, D. S. (2025). Framing the energy crisis: An analysis of CNN’s media hegemony in EU energy crisis coverage. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 6(4), 1462–1474. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v6i4.1913
Shin, G.W. (2015). National identities, historical memories, and reconciliation in Northeast Asia. In G. Rozman (Ed.), Asia’s alliance triangle (pp. 201–215). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137541710_16
Glaser, C. L., Berger, T. U., Mochizuki, M. M., & Lind, J. (2009). Roundtable discussion of jennifer lind’s sorry states: Apologies in international politics. Journal of East Asian Studies, 9(3), 337–368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800006706
Guo, Y. (2021). Transnational journalism history and China matters. TMG Journal for Media History, 24(1–2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.18146/tmg.781
Gustafsson K. (2014). Memory politics and ontological security in Sino-Japanese relations. Asian Studies Review, 1(38), 71–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2013.852156
Gustafsson, K. (2022). Understanding the persistence of history-related issues in Sino-Japanese relations: From memory to forgetting. Historical Memory and Foreign Policy, 57(6), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00219-7
He, Y. (2009). The search for reconciliation: Sino-Japanese and Germany-Polish relations since World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
He, Y. (2013). 40 years in paradox: Post-normalisation Sino-Japanese relations. China Perspectives, 2013(4), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.6314
Hu, Y. S. & J. (2020). A territorial dispute or an agenda war? A cross-national investigation of the network agenda-setting (NAS) model. Tand Of Online, 357–375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1756553
Huttunen, M. (2025). Projecting the Nanjing Massacre. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 20(2), 207–238. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-bja10212
Johnston, A. I. (2012). What (if anything) does East Asia tell us about International Relations Theory?. Annual Review of Political Science, 15(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.040908.120058
Kaufman, S. J. (2006). Escaping the symbolic politics trap: Reconciliation initiatives and conflict resolution in ethnic wars. Journal of Peace Research, 43(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343306060622
Lamont, C. (2022). Research methods in international relations. (Vols. 1-0). SAGE Publications Ltd, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036231811
Li, H., & Huang, S. (2021). The Nanjing massacre and the making of mediated trauma (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.
McNeill, D., & Kato, N. (2024). Fanning the flames: China vs. Japan in the media. Asia-Pacific Journal, 22(5), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1557466024029140
Okuda, H. (2016). China’s “peaceful rise/peaceful development”: A case study of media frames of the rise of China. Global Media and China, 1(1–2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436416646275
Peou, S. (2002). Realism and constructivism in Southeast Asian security studies today: A review essay. The Pacific Review, 15(1), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740110110882
Piburn, P. (2021). Up all night: Ted turner, CNN, and the birth of 24-hour news. American Journalism, 38(1), 112–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/08821127.2021.1865101
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011
Powers, S., & Gilboa, E. (2007). Powers, S., & Gilboa, E. (2007). The public diplomacy of Al Jazeera. In P. Seib (Ed.), New media and the new Middle East (pp. 57–69). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230605602_4
Przystup, J. J. (2012). Przystup, J. J. (2012). Japan–China relations 2005–2010: Managing between a rock and a hard place: An interpretative essay. National Defense University Press. https://digitalcommons.ndu.edu/inss-strategic-perspectives/31
Robinson, P. (2013). (2013, October 10). Media as a driving force in international politics: The CNN effect and related debates. Global Policy. https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/08/10/2013/media-driving-force-international-politics-cnn-effect-and-related-debates
Safa, R., & Barati, M. (2024a). CNN and BBC Shaping the Opinions in Different Countries: A multi-dimensional descriptive commentary related to security, military and diplomacy. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 9(6), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.96.43
Safa, R., & Barati, M. (2024b). CNN and BBC Shaping the Opinions in Different Countries: A multi-dimensional descriptive commentary related to security, military and diplomacy. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 9(6), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.96.43
Sharma, K. A., & Naresh, S. (2022). Setting narrative through instagram posts: A study of BBC’s reportage on Afghanistan. Arab Studies Quarterly, 44(2). https://doi.org/10.13169/arabstudquar.44.2.0084
Volker, I., & Lee, C. (2014). Shifting the politics of memory: Mnemonic trajectories in a global public terrain. In B. Zelizer & K. Tenenboim-Weinblatt (Eds.), Journalism and memory (pp. 50–65). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137263940_4
Wang, F. (2025). We were never friends': A massacre on the eve of WW2 still haunts China-Japan relations. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp89ed9j5ygo
Wang, M., & Okano-Heijmans, M. (2011). Overcoming the past in Sino-Japanese relations?. The International Spectator, 46(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2011.549759
Wang, Z. (2008). National humiliation, history education, and the politics of historical memory: Patriotic education campaign in China. International Studies Quarterly, 52(4), 783–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00526.x
Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wolf, R. (2011). Respect and disrespect in international politics: The significance of status recognition. International Theory, 3(1), 105–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971910000308
Xu, Y., & Zhao, J. (2023). The power of history: How a victimization narrative shapes national identity and public opinion in China. Research & Politics, 10(2). 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680231154837
Yoshida, T. (2013). The Nanjing Massacre. Changing Contours of history and memory in Japan, China, and the U.S. Asia-Pacific Journal, 11(S7), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1557466013025928
Copyright (c) 2026 Maurits Bhoas Ering
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Indonesian Journal of International Relations (IJIR) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Copyright Notice
An author who publishes in the Indonesian Journal of International Relations (IJIR) agrees to the following terms:
- The author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
