Dilema Pluralisme dan Solidarisme: Fleksibilitas Norma Non-Intervensi ASEAN dalam Intervensi INTERFET di Timor Timur (1999-2000)

  • Elys Krisdiana Universitas Airlangga
Keywords: ASEAN, INTERFET, English School, non-intervensi, krisis Timor Timur 1999-2000

Abstract

This study analyzes the participation of four ASEAN member states (Thailand, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Singapore) in the INTERFET mission during the 1999 East Timor crisis. Utilizing Barry Buzan’s English School theory (Pluralism vs. Solidarism) and a qualitative case study method, it examines how this engagement reflects normative shifts. The baseline data illustrates a severe humanitarian crisis that prompted individual state participation under UN Resolution 1264. Findings reveal that while ASEAN maintained institutional bystanding to respect sovereignty (Pluralism), member states individually embraced humanitarian responsibility (Solidarism). This dilemma was normatively reconciled through Indonesia’s formal consent. The study concludes that ASEAN's non-interference principle is not absolute, but an adaptive political tool accommodating normative flexibility

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acharya, A. (2001). Acharya, A. (2001). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia. Routledge.

Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582024

ASEAN. (1976 ASEAN. (1976). Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia.

Anita, W. (2022). Perspektif ASEAN Terhadap Prinsip Non-Intervensi. Jurnal USM Law Review, 5(1), 377-388. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4802

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (2007). The ASEAN Charter. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf

Association of Southeast Asian Nations. (1976). Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia. https://asean.org/our-communities/asean-political-security-community/outward-looking-community/treaty-of-amity-and-cooperation-in-southeast-asia-tac/

BBC. (2018). (2018, February 21). East Timor profile. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-14919009

Bellamy, A. J., & Beeson, M. (2010). The responsibility to protect in Southeast Asia: Can ASEAN reconcile humanitarianism and sovereignty? Asian Security, 6(3), 262–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2010.507414

Buzan, B. (2004). From international to world society? English School theory and the social structure of globalisation. Cambridge University Press.

Cotton, J., & Ravenhill, J. (2001). The Australian National University and East Timor. ANU Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Chieocharnpraphan, T. (2015). Strategic partnership between Australia and Thailand: A case study of East Timor. IAFOR Journal of Politics, Economics & Law, 2(1), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.22492/ijpel.2.1.04

Dee, M. (2001). ‘Coalitions of the willing’ and humanitarian intervention: Australia’s involvement with INTERFET. International Peacekeeping, 8(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533310108413905

Dickens, D. (2001). The United Nations in East Timor: Intervention at the Military Operational Level. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 23(2), 213–232. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25798543

Dupont, A. (2000). ASEAN’s response to the East Timor crisis. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 54(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/713613510

Federer, J. F (2005). The UN in East Timor: Building Timor Leste, a fragile state. Charles Darwin University Press (CDU Press), Darwin. Retrieved 2026, January 19, from https://hdl.handle.net/10070/799255.

Martin, I. (2001). Self-determination in East Timor: The United Nations, the ballot, and international intervention. Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Human Rights Watch. (1999). World Report 1999: Indonesia and East Timor. https://www.hrw.org/legacy/worldreport99/asia/indonesia.html

Human Rights Watch. (1999). Indonesia: Violence and responsibility in East Timor.https://www.hrw.org/legacy/worldreport99/asia/indonesia.html

Jones, L. (2010). ASEAN’s unchanged melody? The theory and practice of ‘non-interference’ in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review, 23(4), 479–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2010.495996

Jones, D. M., & Smith, M. L. (2007). ASEAN and East Asian international relations. Edward Elgar.

Pitsuwan, S. (2002, May 19). How East Timor reshaped ASEAN. The Nation, 1, 3.

King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press.

Ramadhani, Z., & Mabrurah. (2021). Pengaruh prinsip non-intervensi ASEAN terhadap upaya negosiasi Indonesia dalam menangani konflik kudeta Myanmar. Global Political Studies Journal, 5(2), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.34010/gpsjournal.v5i2.5954

Tanter, R. (1999). The East Timor Disaster: A Failure of Asian Security. Nautilus Institute.

United Nations. (1999). Report of the Secretary-General on the question of East Timor. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1492926?v=pdf

United Nations Security Council. (1999). Resolution 1264. S/RES/1264 (1999). https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/285615?ln=en&v=pdf

Published
2026-08-29
How to Cite
Elys Krisdiana. (2026). Dilema Pluralisme dan Solidarisme: Fleksibilitas Norma Non-Intervensi ASEAN dalam Intervensi INTERFET di Timor Timur (1999-2000). ndonesian ournal of nternational elations, 10(2), 289-308. https://doi.org/10.32787/ijir.v10i2.860